← All projects

PROJECT 024 / 102 · Marketing

Unknown category coverage.

Which fields contain the most explicit unknown values, and does their response mix differ?

Focused analytical studyBank marketingExecuted notebook

THE RESULT

What the data shows

The largest computed metric is 0.8175 for poutcome; the smallest is 0 for marital. Metric: unknown_share (Unknown share).

A documented unknown category is not the same as an empty CSV cell. Coverage differences may reflect workflow selection.

Unknown category coverage — chart from the computed study output
Computed study output. Full values and units are available in the results download.
Computed results · 5 of 5 rows. Values rounded for display; source units and raw column names are retained in the download.
fieldunknown rowsunknown shareunknown responseknown response
job2880.006370.11810.117
marital00Unavailable0.117
education1,8570.041070.13570.1162
contact13,0200.2880.040710.1478
poutcome36,9590.81750.091620.2306
Download the complete result table ↓

THE METHOD

From source to answer

Field-level missing-category coverage and observed outcome comparison.

The Python source exposes this study’s transformations. The complete project download includes shared preparation and evaluation routines.

THE NEXT DECISION

What follows from the finding

Improve source capture for fields with material unknown coverage, then reassess model stability.

Where the conclusion stops

Observational marketing records do not identify campaign uplift. Month and row order are not precise timestamps; repeated-client identifiers are unavailable. Models are research diagnostics, not financial eligibility or automated contact decisions.

Related studies may reuse observations or holdouts. These are historical analyses; associations and backtests do not demonstrate commercial impact. Further model tuning needs new, untouched evaluation data.