← All projects

PROJECT 029 / 102 · Food science

Chemistry associations with quality.

Which laboratory measurements have the strongest rank associations with quality within each wine type?

Focused analytical studyWine qualityExecuted notebook

THE RESULT

What the data shows

The largest computed metric is 0.4785 for red / alcohol; the smallest is -0.3806 for red / volatile_acidity. Metric: spearman_rho (Spearman correlation).

The table contains both types. Correlations do not adjust for other chemistry or multiple exploratory comparisons.

Chemistry associations with quality — chart from the computed study output
Computed study output. Full values and units are available in the results download.
Computed results · 12 of 22 rows. Values rounded for display; source units and raw column names are retained in the download.
featurespearman rhoabsolute rhopaired rowswine typeassociation
alcohol0.47850.47851,599redred / alcohol
volatile_acidity-0.38060.38061,599redred / volatile_acidity
sulphates0.37710.37711,599redred / sulphates
citric_acid0.21350.21351,599redred / citric_acid
total_sulfur_dioxide-0.19670.19671,599redred / total_sulfur_dioxide
chlorides-0.18990.18991,599redred / chlorides
density-0.17710.17711,599redred / density
fixed_acidity0.11410.11411,599redred / fixed_acidity
free_sulfur_dioxide-0.05690.05691,599redred / free_sulfur_dioxide
ph-0.043670.043671,599redred / ph
residual_sugar0.032050.032051,599redred / residual_sugar
alcohol0.44040.44044,898whitewhite / alcohol
Download the complete result table ↓

THE METHOD

From source to answer

Pairwise complete Spearman correlations stratified by wine type.

The Python source exposes this study’s transformations. The complete project download includes shared preparation and evaluation routines.

THE NEXT DECISION

What follows from the finding

Prioritize hypotheses for experiments while checking whether pooled relationships mask type differences.

Where the conclusion stops

Sensory scores are ordinal and concentrated in the middle. Producer and batch IDs are unavailable. Associations are not recipes for changing quality or evidence of market price.

Related studies may reuse observations or holdouts. These are historical analyses; associations and backtests do not demonstrate commercial impact. Further model tuning needs new, untouched evaluation data.