← All projects

PROJECT 089 / 102 · Manufacturing

Compact inspection feature set.

How much recognition performance changes when only compact geometric features are retained?

Focused analytical studySteel plate faultsExecuted notebook

THE RESULT

What the data shows

The largest computed metric is 0.7829 for Full / Random forest; the smallest is 0.07239 for Compact / Prior baseline. Metric: macro_f1 (Macro F1).

Feature sets were specified before scoring. The full-signature grouping does not guarantee unseen machine or batch generalization.

Compact inspection feature set — chart from the computed study output
Computed study output. Full values and units are available in the results download.
Computed results · 6 of 6 rows. Values rounded for display; source units and raw column names are retained in the download.
modelaccuracybalanced accuracymacro f1featuresvariant
Prior baseline0.33930.14290.07239CompactCompact / Prior baseline
Logistic regression0.54240.33370.3301CompactCompact / Logistic regression
Random forest0.58870.56390.5711CompactCompact / Random forest
Prior baseline0.33930.14290.07239FullFull / Prior baseline
Logistic regression0.67870.69010.6842FullFull / Logistic regression
Random forest0.74550.76630.7829FullFull / Random forest
Download the complete result table ↓

THE METHOD

From source to answer

Paired fixed-model ablation using the same full-signature input groups.

The Python source exposes this study’s transformations. The complete project download includes shared preparation and evaluation routines.

EVALUATION

How the result was checked

Fixed 80/20 split of unique input groups (seed 42); exact input duplicates stay together.

1,552Training observations
389Test observations

Fixed models; default decision threshold; no holdout tuning.

Target and input features

Target: fault

Inputs: pixels_areas, x_perimeter, y_perimeter, minimum_of_luminosity, maximum_of_luminosity, length_of_conveyer, typeofsteel_a300, typeofsteel_a400, steel_plate_thickness, edges_index, empty_index, square_index, outside_x_index, edges_x_index, edges_y_index, outside_global_index, logofareas, log_x_index, log_y_index, orientation_index, luminosity_index, sigmoidofareas

Download evaluation record ↓

THE NEXT DECISION

What follows from the finding

Compare measurement cost and external validation results before reducing the inspection feature set.

Where the conclusion stops

Every source row is a recorded fault. The data cannot estimate a production defect rate or distinguish healthy plates. Batch and machine IDs are absent, so grouped exact-input holdouts do not prove factory transfer.

Related studies may reuse observations or holdouts. These are historical analyses; associations and backtests do not demonstrate commercial impact. Further model tuning needs new, untouched evaluation data.