← All projects

PROJECT 016 / 102 · Mobility

Year-over-year demand comparison.

How does observed hourly demand compare between corresponding months of the two years?

Focused analytical studyBike sharingExecuted notebook

THE RESULT

What the data shows

The largest computed metric is 1.529 for 3.0; the smallest is 0.4133 for 6.0. Metric: relative_change (Relative change).

Different weather, availability and missing-hour patterns remain confounders. Means use observed hours only.

Year-over-year demand comparison — chart from the computed study output
Computed study output. Full values and units are available in the results download.
Computed results · 12 of 12 rows. Values rounded for display; source units and raw column names are retained in the download.
mnthmean 2011mean 2012hours 2011hours 2012relative change
155.51130.66887411.352
274.291496496921.006
387.73221.97307431.529
4131.9242.77197180.839
5182.6263.37447440.4421
6199.3281.77207200.4133
7190273.77447440.4405
8187288.37317440.5418
9177.7303.67177200.7083
10166.2280.87437080.6895
11142.1212.67197180.4963
12117.8166.77417420.4148
Download the complete result table ↓

THE METHOD

From source to answer

Month-matched means and observation counts, rather than unadjusted monthly totals.

The Python source exposes this study’s transformations. The complete project download includes shared preparation and evaluation routines.

THE NEXT DECISION

What follows from the finding

Investigate system expansion and service availability before attributing observed growth to behavior.

Where the conclusion stops

Historical system rentals measure realized use, not unmet demand or station inventory. Missing hours are unknown. Weather associations do not establish causal effects.

Related studies may reuse observations or holdouts. These are historical analyses; associations and backtests do not demonstrate commercial impact. Further model tuning needs new, untouched evaluation data.