← All projects

PROJECT 052 / 102 · Energy

High-load interval warning benchmark.

Can past appliance use rank unusually high-load intervals one hour ahead?

Focused analytical studyAppliance energyExecuted notebook

THE RESULT

What the data shows

The largest computed metric is 0.2948 for Random forest; the smallest is 0.07502 for Prior baseline. Metric: average_precision (Average precision).

High load is strictly greater than the training 90th percentile (210 Wh). It is a study threshold, not a safety limit.

High-load interval warning benchmark — chart from the computed study output
Computed study output. Full values and units are available in the results download.
Computed results · 3 of 3 rows. Values rounded for display; source units and raw column names are retained in the download.
modelaccuracybalanced accuracymacro f1roc aucaverage precisionbrier
Prior baseline0.9250.50.48050.50.075020.06991
Logistic regression0.92680.52910.53660.81350.29350.06171
Random forest0.92170.55130.57010.85650.29480.06077
Download the complete result table ↓

THE METHOD

From source to answer

Threshold defined from the training prefix only, with chronological classification.

The Python source exposes this study’s transformations. The complete project download includes shared preparation and evaluation routines.

EVALUATION

How the result was checked

First 80% of ordered observations train; final 20% test.

15,672Training observations
3,919Test observations

Fixed models; default decision threshold; no holdout tuning.

Target and input features

Target: high_load

Inputs: hour, weekday, lag_6, lag_12, lag_144

Download evaluation record ↓

THE NEXT DECISION

What follows from the finding

Choose warning costs and evaluate on a fresh period before defining an operational alert.

Where the conclusion stops

Measurements come from one home over a limited period. Energy is Wh per recorded 10-minute interval. This is not a representative household sample; tariffs and occupancy labels are unavailable.

Related studies may reuse observations or holdouts. These are historical analyses; associations and backtests do not demonstrate commercial impact. Further model tuning needs new, untouched evaluation data.