← All projects

PROJECT 071 / 102 · Mobility

Engine configuration comparison.

How do cylinder groups differ in observed fuel economy and vehicle weight?

Focused analytical studyFuel economyExecuted notebook

THE RESULT

What the data shows

The largest computed metric is 28.25 for 4.0; the smallest is 14 for 8.0. Metric: median_mpg (Miles per US gallon).

Rare cylinder groups have few observations. Missing horsepower is not filled for descriptive medians.

Engine configuration comparison — chart from the computed study output
Computed study output. Full values and units are available in the results download.
Computed results · 5 of 5 rows. Values rounded for display; source units and raw column names are retained in the download.
cylindersvehiclesmedian mpgmedian weightmedian horsepower
3420.252,37598.5
420428.252,23278
5325.42,95077
684193,201.50100
8103144,140150
Download the complete result table ↓

THE METHOD

From source to answer

Cylinder-level sample sizes and median specifications.

The Python source exposes this study’s transformations. The complete project download includes shared preparation and evaluation routines.

THE NEXT DECISION

What follows from the finding

Evaluate comparable vehicle configurations rather than interpreting a cylinder category as an isolated cause.

Where the conclusion stops

Historical city-cycle vehicle observations are not current fleet performance. Vehicle mix and model year are confounded. A '?' horsepower value means missing, not zero.

Related studies may reuse observations or holdouts. These are historical analyses; associations and backtests do not demonstrate commercial impact. Further model tuning needs new, untouched evaluation data.