← All projects

PROJECT 080 / 102 · Commerce

Cross-category spending relationships.

Which spending categories show the strongest customer-level rank associations?

Focused analytical studyWholesale customersExecuted notebook

THE RESULT

What the data shows

The largest computed metric is 0.8013 for grocery / detergents_paper; the smallest is -0.2072 for frozen / detergents_paper. Metric: spearman_rho (Spearman correlation).

Customer scale and channel can induce correlations across categories.

Cross-category spending relationships — chart from the computed study output
Computed study output. Full values and units are available in the results download.
Computed results · 12 of 15 rows. Values rounded for display; source units and raw column names are retained in the download.
pairspearman rho
grocery / detergents_paper0.8013
milk / grocery0.773
milk / detergents_paper0.68
fresh / frozen0.3844
milk / delicassen0.3728
grocery / delicassen0.3043
fresh / delicassen0.2384
frozen / delicassen0.233
detergents_paper / delicassen0.1833
fresh / milk-0.08392
milk / frozen-0.09297
fresh / grocery-0.12
Download the complete result table ↓

THE METHOD

From source to answer

Pairwise Spearman correlations across all six categories.

The Python source exposes this study’s transformations. The complete project download includes shared preparation and evaluation routines.

THE NEXT DECISION

What follows from the finding

Identify bundle hypotheses and test incremental response instead of assuming co-spend implies bundle demand.

Where the conclusion stops

Annual customer spending uses source monetary units, not an assumed currency. There are no margins, transactions or dates. Customer segments are descriptive and do not establish promotion response.

Related studies may reuse observations or holdouts. These are historical analyses; associations and backtests do not demonstrate commercial impact. Further model tuning needs new, untouched evaluation data.