← All projects

PROJECT 081 / 102 · Commerce

Regional customer basket comparison.

How does observed total annual spending differ across recorded regions?

Focused analytical studyWholesale customersExecuted notebook

THE RESULT

What the data shows

The largest computed metric is 2.803e+04 for 3.0; the smallest is 2.538e+04 for 1.0. Metric: median (Source monetary units).

Region codes remain as documented source categories; unequal samples are not representative market sizes.

Regional customer basket comparison — chart from the computed study output
Computed study output. Full values and units are available in the results download.
Computed results · 3 of 3 rows. Values rounded for display; source units and raw column names are retained in the download.
regioncustomersmedianp25p75
17725,38517,18438,699
24726,95320,611.5036,158.50
331628,02917,209.2542,492.25
Download the complete result table ↓

THE METHOD

From source to answer

Regional sample sizes, medians and quartiles of customer totals.

The Python source exposes this study’s transformations. The complete project download includes shared preparation and evaluation routines.

THE NEXT DECISION

What follows from the finding

Validate regional coverage before interpreting observed mix as market opportunity.

Where the conclusion stops

Annual customer spending uses source monetary units, not an assumed currency. There are no margins, transactions or dates. Customer segments are descriptive and do not establish promotion response.

Related studies may reuse observations or holdouts. These are historical analyses; associations and backtests do not demonstrate commercial impact. Further model tuning needs new, untouched evaluation data.