← All projects

PROJECT 084 / 102 · Manufacturing

Fault geometry profiles.

How do pixel area and perimeter profiles differ by recorded fault class?

Focused analytical studySteel plate faultsExecuted notebook

THE RESULT

What the data shows

The largest computed metric is 6,281 for K_Scatch; the smallest is 16.5 for Stains. Metric: median_pixels (Pixels).

Image-scale and acquisition conditions may differ; geometry is not a physical damage severity measure.

Fault geometry profiles — chart from the computed study output
Computed study output. Full values and units are available in the results download.
Computed results · 7 of 7 rows. Values rounded for display; source units and raw column names are retained in the download.
faultrecordsmedian pixelsmedian x perimetermedian y perimeter
Bumps402120.51716
Dirtiness551452835
K_Scatch3916,281271139
Other_Faults6731462522
Pastry1582092030.5
Stains7216.574.5
Z_Scratch1901462823
Download the complete result table ↓

THE METHOD

From source to answer

Class-level median geometry with sample sizes.

The Python source exposes this study’s transformations. The complete project download includes shared preparation and evaluation routines.

THE NEXT DECISION

What follows from the finding

Discuss whether geometry can support inspection triage with process engineers.

Where the conclusion stops

Every source row is a recorded fault. The data cannot estimate a production defect rate or distinguish healthy plates. Batch and machine IDs are absent, so grouped exact-input holdouts do not prove factory transfer.

Related studies may reuse observations or holdouts. These are historical analyses; associations and backtests do not demonstrate commercial impact. Further model tuning needs new, untouched evaluation data.